Journal Of Capital Development in Behavioural Sciences · ISSN 0000-0000

Organisational Commitment among Secondary School Teachers: Caryl Rusbult’s Theory Review

Folasade Olufemi IPEAYEDA, Afolakemi Olasumbo OREDEIN

Vol. 12 (1) Year 2024 Pages 190-205 Access Open
View PDF Back to volume
Abstract

Summary

Caryl Rusbult’s theory was a theory rooted in independent theory postulated in the early 1950s. Caryl Rusbult’s theory was based on the assumption that commitment is subject to experience as a result of independence. The theory of commitment postulates that the more one invests his/her time, skill, energy, and some other personal assets in the organisation, the more one has atstake in living it. The theory is also a function of three variables: satisfaction level, quality of alternative and investment size. These three variables indicated that commitment to the relationship persists not only because of the positive qualities that attract partners to each other, but of the bond that binds the two partners to one another and the absence of a better option that goes beyond the relationship exists between the present partners,however, teachers’ organisational commitment can manifest or occur in threedifferent domains which are affective, normative and continuance. In thisstudy, Caryl Rusbult’s theory was evaluated and analysed based on itsweakness, strength and implication for the organisational commitment ofsecondary school teachers. Merits and demerits including the model of thetheory were also considered.

Contributors

Authors

Folasade Olufemi IPEAYEDA

Department of Art and Social Science Education, Faculty of Education, Lead City University, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
Corresponding author

Afolakemi Olasumbo OREDEIN

Department of Art and Social Science Education, Faculty of Education, Lead City University, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
How to cite

Citation

Folasade Olufemi IPEAYEDA, Afolakemi Olasumbo OREDEIN (2024). Organisational Commitment among Secondary School Teachers: Caryl Rusbult’s Theory Review. Journal Of Capital Development in Behavioural Sciences, 12(1), pp. 190-205.
Copied